The What Works Clearinghouse has included a recommendation for "extended discussion around text" in its adolescent literacy practice guide of 2008, with moderate evidence of effectiveness. Kamil (2011) elaborated on this recommendation, noting a discussion protocol and three types of discussion.
Three types of discussions were presented as well, including Critical/Analytic, Efferent, and Expressive. (Follow the link below with Kamil's [2011] citation for further information.) Efferent discussion increased student talk and comprehension more than other types presented (Kamil). Efferent questions are those that refer to factual data rather than personal reactions to information. Example efferent questions: “What was the main idea?” or “What did the author mean by a particular statement or action within a passage?” Efferent discussions, in which Questioning the Author is used, are the only discussions in which the approach is designed specifically to help students grapple with the meaning of informational text (Wilkinson, 2010).
Suggested Efferent Questions:
"What did John do to Alex in this story?"
"What is the author saying here?"
"Does this information agree with other information?"
This is your Sidebar, which you can edit like any other page in your workspace.
This Sidebar appears everywhere on your workspace. Add to it whatever you like -- a navigation section, a link to your favorite web sites, or anything else.
Comments (0)
You don't have permission to comment on this page.